본문 바로가기 주메뉴로 바로가기
All
TITLE Supreme Court Decision 2013Da201844 Decided December 12, 2013【Damages】 [full Text]
Summary
Where conviction was finalized on the basis of the state agency’s illegally obtained evidence but later in a retrial acquital was finalized, and a damages claim was filed against the state in which the obligor state’s defense of the lapse of the statute of limitations constitutes an abuse of right, and the reasonable period for the obligee’s exercise of right during which the state’s defense of lapse of the statute of limitations can be barred
Prev Supreme Court Decision 2011Du4282 Decided December 12, 2013【Revocation of Retrial Adjudication of Relief from Unfair Transfer
Next Supreme Court Decision 2011Da112247, 112254 Decided December 12, 2013【Stock Transfer Proceedings, etc.ㆍStock Transfer Proceedings, etc.】
219 Seocho-daero,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100