본문 바로가기 주메뉴로 바로가기
All
TITLE Supreme Court Decision 2012Do13665 Decided August 14, 2013【Larceny】 [full Text]
Summary
Where a witness who testified at a preparatory hearing or during trial was summoned by the prosecutor later and reversed his former testimony favorable to Defendant during the prosecutor’s questioning, whether the protocol of statement prepared as above can be admitted as evidence (negative in principle), and whether the same legal principle applies to a protocol of prosecutor’s questioning of a suspect upon suspicion of perjury against a witness after his/her testimony is finished (affirmative)
Prev Supreme Court Decision 2011Do3599 Decided August 22, 2013【Violation of the Copyright Act】
Next Supreme Court Decision 2013Do2511 Decided July 26, 2013 【Violation of the National Security Act (Organizing Anti-government Organization, etc.)ㆍViolation of the National Security Act (Espionage)ㆍViolation of the National Security Act (Voluntary SupportㆍReceiving and Giving Money)ㆍViolation of the National Security Act (Special InfiltrationㆍEscape)ㆍViolation of the National Security Act (Praise,
219 Seocho-daero,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100